Soumen Jana v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

22/01 In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction AD-06/24 Appellate Side 266312 NANDY WPA 26929 of 2025 (CORRECTION) SOUMEN JANA Vs.

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Mr. Bratin Kumar Dey, Advocate Ms. Anjana Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Subhankar Banerjee, Advocate ......for the Petitioner Mr. Swapan Kumar Dutta, Ld. Government Pleader Mr. Dipankar Das Gupta, Advocate ......for the State Ms. Vijaya Bhatia, Advocate Mr. Ganesh Prasad Shaw, Advocate Mr. Gourav Kumar, Advocate ......for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 Mr. Amit Kumar Rudani, Advocate ......for the Respondent No. 6

1. This matter has come up in the list at the instance of the learned Advocates appearing the petitioner for correction of an order dated 13.01.2026, wherein the following corrections should be effected:- i) The words 'his Supervisor' appearing in the third line of second paragraph of the said order, should be replaced with 'Ph.D Committee'.

ii) The date recorded in the second paragraph should be 'October 28, 2025' instead of 'September 9, 2025'. iii) The date recorded in the third paragraph should be 'October 28, 2025' instead of 'September 9, 2025'.

2. Office is directed to correct such mistake as pointed out at the relevant portion of the order dated 13.01.2026 without any other alteration.

3. This order may be read conjointly with the order dated 13.01.2026.

4. At this juncture, Mr. Rudani, learned Advocate appearing for the respondent no. 6 seeks extension of time to reply to the e-mail of September 9, 2025.

5. Let such reply be given by 03.02.2026.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

P a g e | 2