Hrisikesh Maity v. Biswanath Saha

23.02 C.O. 4228 of 2016 With C.O. 4240 of 2016 Hrisikesh Maity -VersusBiswanath Saha Ct.

No.

akb Parties are not represented. On earlier occasion petitioners were also not represented.

I have reason to believe that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the applications. The revisional applications, being C.O.4228 of 2016 and C.O. 4240 of 2016 are dismissed for default. Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated. There will be no order as to costs.

( Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)