Jitendra Nath Pramanik @ Jaten Pramanik And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

08.12.2022 Serial no.52 S. De CRM (A) 5722 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Raiganj Women Police Station Case No. 107 of 2022 dated 04.07.2022 under Sections 498A/313/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code (Corresponding G.R. Case No. 1772 of 2022).

-AndIn the matter of : Jitendra Nath Pramanik @ Jaten Pramanik & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury, Advocate Ms. Busra Khatoon, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Mousumi Sarkar, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Husband was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court. The allegation against the petitioners appears to be omnibus and general in nature.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners will report before the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

CRM (A) 5722 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)