Tahor Sk @ Tahiruddin Sekh v. The State Of West Bengal

(ADSL) 114.

13.02.2025 Court No.26 (Pritam) (Rejected)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (DB) 3828 of 2024 In Re: - An application of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

And In the matter of: - Tahor Sk. @ Tahiruddin Sekh. .....petitioner.

Mr. Md. Golam Nure Imrohi ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Antarikhya Basu Mr. Asraf Mondal ....for the State.

1. Petitioner prays for bail.

2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is the father of the husband. He points out that the petitioner is in custody for nine months and that the charge-sheet was submitted. He also refers to a statement of the son of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., where he contends that the said son implicates all the accused.

3. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the court to the materials in the case diary, including the dying declaration recorded by the victim.

4. Prayer for anticipatory bail of one of the accused was rejected passed in May 21, 2024 passed in CRM (A) 1769 of 2024 made in her dying declaration stated that the kerosene was poured on her

and she was set on fire by the accused. The victim named three persons in such activity and named the petitioner before us as one of them.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. The prayer for bail is, thus, rejected.

7. CRM (DB) 3828 of 2024 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)