← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/5767/2022allowed

Dhananjoy Singh And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-12-12Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

C.R.M. (A) 5767 of 2022 (AD) 12.12.2022 Court No.29 (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bhagwangola Police Station Case No.93 of 2020 dated 19/02/2020 under Sections 406/409/381/120B of the Indian Penal Code,1860 and subsequently Charge Sheet submitted under Sections 406/409/381/420/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In the matter of: Dhananjoy Singh & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Madhu Jana Mr. Ujjal Chakrabarty ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Mr. Subrato Roy ...for the State.

Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

The principal accused was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court.

Other co-accuseds were enlarged on anticipatory bail by this Court.

The police filed charge sheet.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition

that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 5767 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)