← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/3870/2024dismissed as rejected

Shadab Ali Ansari v. The State Of West Bengal

2025-02-14Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

14.02.2025 Court No.26 S.D.

CRM (DB) 3870 of 2024 In re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Rabindranagar Police Station Case No. 54 of 2022 dated 14.03.2022 under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -And- In the matter of: Shadab Ali Ansari ... ... Petitioner Md. Shahjahan Hossain Ms. Sanjida Sultana Mr. Prithwiraj Biswas Mr. S. Mallick ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Avishek Sinha Ms. Sonali Bhar ... ...For the State Mr. Satadru Lahiri Sk. Abumusa ..For the defacto complainant Petitioner renews the prayer for bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in excess of 2 years and 11 months. Out of 25 charge sheeted witnesses, prosecution examined only 3 and, therefore, there is hardly any possibility of trial ending any time soon.

State and the defacto complainant are represented. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the evidence of the prosecution, copies of which are annexed to the application for bail. He

submits that the petitioner and the co-accused were caught red handed with the victim in the room belonging to the petitioner along with the victim.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner in the incident and the period of detention and the fact that prosecution now proposes to examine 12 more witnesses, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

The application being C.R.M. (DB) 3870 of 2024 stands dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)