Dipu Mondal v. Bimalendu Nath, The Cartificate Officer S 24 Parganas
1082. 04.04.2025 (M/L) Court No.05.
(Pritam) CPAN 1558 of 2023 with CAN 1 of 2025 in WPA 6079 of 2023 Dipu Mondal -Vs.- Bimalendu Nath Mr. Senjuti Sengupta, Mr. Rananesh Guha Thakurata ...for the petitioner.
Mr. Bipin Ghosh.
...for the alleged contemnor.
.
Mr. S. K. Singh, Mr. R. K. Dubey.
....for the Management.
1. Affidavit-of-service filed in court today be kept with the records.
2. Mr. Ghosh, learned advocate representing the alleged contemnor files a compliance report affirmed on February 19, 2025 by the Certificate Officer which is taken on record. He would submit that subsequent to affirming the aforesaid compliance report, the entire amount covered under the certificate issued under Section 8 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 along with the compounding interest has already been disbursed in favour of the petitioner. In support of his
contention, he places before this court photocopies of the cheques which had been made over to the Certificate Officer by the Certificate debtor in compliance with the directions issued by the Certificate Officer as would appear from the letter dated March 3, 2025, which is taken record.
3. Mr. Ghosh, would also submit by placing before this court the copies of the cheques drawn in favour of the petitioner for a sum of Rs.24,960/- dated March 11, 2025 and the letter dated March 17, 2025 issued by the petitioner confirming that the petitioner has received all his money under the certificate No.84/2022, that the entire Certificate dues covered under Certificate dated November 18, 2022 has already been cleared by the Certificate debtor to the satisfaction of the Certificate Officer.
4. Let copies of all the documents as placed before this court by Mr. Ghosh, be retained with the records.
5. Ms. Sengupta, learned advocate for the petitioner does not dispute the above.
6. Having regard thereto, nothing survives in the contempt application and the same is accordingly disposed of without any further order.
7. Since the contempt application has already been disposed of, the connected application being CAN 1 of
2025 having become infructuous is accordingly, also disposed of without any further order.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)