Aditya Das And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

09.12.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 16.

Rakib (rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1588 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, in connection with Samsherganj Police Station case no. 108 of 2025 dated 18.02.2025 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

And In the matter of : Aditya Das & Anr.

......Petitioners.

Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Ms. Ankusha Ghosh ......for the Petitioners.

Mr. Bitashok Banerjee Mr. Soumodip Saha ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on the accusations of recovery of 145 kgs of ganja and they are in custody for nine months 20 days without the evidence of the case progressing.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

I have considered the totality of the facts of the case and I am of the opinion that the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS are attracted.

As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioners in CRM (NDPS) 1588 of 2025 is dismissed.

Learned Special Court is directed to ensure that a schedule be fixed on each and every month consisting of three dates.

Prosecution would put in efforts to produce all the witnesses when the learned Special Court fixes the relevant dates.

No unnecessary adjournment be granted to any of the parties and the trial of the case would continue in spite of the resolution of the local bar.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)