Manjarul Laskar @ Monjarul Laskar And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

10.12.2025 Serial no. 50 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 2634 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Usthi Police Station Case No. 229 of 2025 dated 18.05.2025 u/s 103(2)/3(5) of the BNS, 2023 corresponding to GR Case No. 1601 of 2025.

-AndIn the matter of : Manjarul Laskar @ Monjarul Laskar & Anr.

... ... Petitioner(s) Ms. Minoti Gomes ... for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Soumik Ganguly Mr. Dipankar Paramanick ... for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for almost seven months and are similarly situated with the another accused, namely, Mijanur Laskar, who has been granted bail in CRM (M) 2314 of 2025. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail but is unable to distinguish the locus of the present petitioners with that of Mijanur Laskar.

I have taken into account the earlier order passed, wherein the principal accused were referred as Ismail and Kamarul but the present petitioners are Manjarul Laskar @ Monjarul Laskar and Safirul Laskar.

I have taken into account the locus of the present petitioners who are more or less similarly situated as that of Mijanur Laskar.

Having considered the same, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.

Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioners viz, Manjarul Laskar @ Monjarul Laskar and Safirul Laskar shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Diamond Harbour.

If on bail, the petitioners shall not enter the jurisdiction of Usthi Police Station and will inform their address to the local police station as also the learned trial court where they would be residing.

The petitioners should also be physically present on each and every date of the trial so fixed by the learned trial court. The learned trial court would be at liberty to impose further conditions as it deems fit and proper for ensuring proper progress of the trial.

In case, there is any violation of the aforesaid conditions, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail without further reference to this court. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2634 of 2025 is allowed.

Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)