Saddam Sk @ Saddam Sekh v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

01.07.2026 Court No.35.

D/L. 13.

Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 2689 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Ekbalpore Police Station Case No. 686 of 2023 dated 06.12.2023 under sections 366A/370/370A/372/373/120B of the Indian Penal Code read with sections 4/17 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and sections 3/4/5/6/7 of the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, 1956. And In the matter of : Saddam Sk. @ Saddam Sekh ......Petitioner.

Mr. Md. Mozammel Hossain Mr. Sandipan Maity Mr. Soumen Gayen ......for the Petitioner.

Ms. Jhuma Sen Mr. Yuvraj Chatterjee Mr. Arpita De .....for Minor Victims.

Mr. Rajendranath Banerjee, APP Ms. Koel Mukherjee ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for 2 years and 6 months. According to the petitioner, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and there is no possibility of the trial concluding, as such the petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary, drawn the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim as well as some other witnesses.

Learned advocate for the defacto complainant is also present.

I have taken into account the fact that the evidence of the two victims are not yet over. Having considered the same, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (M) 2689 of 2025 is rejected.

Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)