Ruktar @Ruktar Ali v. State Of West Bengal

22.12.2022 Serial no.30 Aloke CRM (A) 5949 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Harishchandrapur Police Station Case No. 808 of 2022 dated 06.09.2022 under Sections 195(A)/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of : Ruktar @ Ruktar Ali ... ... Petitioner Mr. Koustav Bagchi, Advocate Mr. Arup Sarkar, Advocate Mr. Debayan Ghosh Ms. Sabanam Laskar, Advocate Ms. Priti Kar Ms. Sabanam Laskar, Advocate Ms. Sabanam Laskar, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioner M. Arijit Ganguly, Advocate Mr. Sanjib Kr. Dan, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

The materials in the case diary do not suggest the requirement of custodial interrogation of the petitioner. In such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner

in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (A) 5949 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)