← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/2670/2025allowed

Lal Mohan Kamila @ Lalu @ Lalmohan Kamila v. State Of West Bengal

2025-12-22Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh3 pages

22.12.2025 Serial no. 46 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 2670 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2025 (Sessions Case No. 364 of 2024) arising out of Chandipur PS Case No. 307 of 2024 dated 14.08.2024 u/s 309(6)/311/317(2) of the BNS.

-AndIn the matter of : Lal Mohan Kamila @ Lalu @ Lalmohan Kamila ... Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nag Mr. A. Tiwari ... for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Sanjay Banerjee Ms. Trisha Rakshit ... for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one year and three months and the trial of the case is progressing slowly.

It has also been submitted that a sum of Rs.15,000/- and a nose pin is the subject-matter of the case. Again, it is submitted that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of statement of a co-accused who revealed to the police authorities that a sum of Rs.6,500/- has been transmitted to him and there were certain recoveries from the shop of the son of the present petitioner. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and refers to the seizure list as also the TI Parade

where the petitioner was identified by the defactocomplainant. It is seen that in the cross-examination, there were certain disturbing answers of the PW 1, who is the defactocomplainant. I have also checked the seizure list which relates to the petitioner in respect of recovery of bag, Aadhar Card, Voter Card and Passbook. However, the said seizure list do not inspire any confidence of this court.

Having considered the overall circumstances, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail.

Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Lal Mohan Kamila @ Lalu @ Lalmohan Kamila shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur. If on bail, the petitioner shall make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Purba Medinipur without prior intimation to the learned trial court. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2670 of 2025 is allowed.

Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.

Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)