← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/4519/2022allowed

Ranjit Mandal @ Sujan v. State Of West Bengal

2022-12-22Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

22.12.2022 Sl. No.34 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (DB) 4519 of 2022 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 16.12.2022 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No.166 of 2016 dated 25.03.2016 under Sections 363/366(A)/376 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 4/8/12 of the POCSO Act.

And In Re: Ranjit Mandal @ Sujan ... ... Petitioner Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Mr. Debapriya Majumder ... ... for the petitioner Mr. Ranabir Roy Chowdhury Mr. Sandip Chakraborty Mr. Mainak Gupta ... ... for the State Petitioner renews his prayer for bail. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for more than six months. It is further submitted victim girl has not attended the court to depose on a number of occasions.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. Bail prayer of the petitioner was rejected earlier on merits. After rejection of bail, victim failed to turn up on two occasions. Under such circumstances and in view of the period of detention suffered by the petitioner, we are of the opinion further detention of the accused/petitioner is not necessary. Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Ranjit Mandal @ Sujan, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special

Court under the POCSO Act-cum-Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Malda subject to condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court. The application for bail, thus, stands allowed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)