Uttam Mondal And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

22.12.2025 Court No.35.

D/L. 57.

Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 2682 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Baraboni PS Case No. 118/2025 dated 23.09.2025 under Section 108/3(5) of BNS Act, 2023;

And In the matter of : Uttam Mondal & Anr.

......Petitioners.

Mr. Ayan Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kunal Ganguly ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Partha Pratim Das Ms. Debadrita Mondal ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for 99 days and charge sheet has already been submitted in connection with the instant case.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioners are thickly connected with the offence. To that effect, the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of the son of the deceased has been produced before this Court.

I have considered the subject matter of the case wherein the brothers were at loggerhead and it has been alleged that

the present petitioners have been throwing stones at the house of the petitioners as well as abuses them which is the cause of such suicide by the elder brother and his wife. Taking into account the period of detention of the petitioners, I am of the view that further detention is unwarranted, as such the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed.

Accordingly, petitioner, namely Uttam Mondal and Putul @ Putuli Mondal shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each. One of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned CJM, Asansol.

If on bail the petitioner shall stay outside the jurisdiction of Baraboni Police Station and shall not enter the jurisdiction of Baraboni. Petitioners shall inform the address where they would reside to the local police station and also make available the said address to the learned Court in seisin of the case. Petitioners shall be physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned CJM and shall not leave the District of Paschim Bardhaman without the prior permission of the learned CJM Asansol or the Trial Court.

With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 2682 of 2025 is allowed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)