← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/2713/2025dismissed

Bidhan Murmu v. State Of West Bengal

2026-04-06Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

06.04.2026 Court No.35.

D/L. 36.

Kausik (Rejected) CRM (M) 2713 of 2025 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Special Task Force (Headquarters) Police Station Case No. 6 of 2025 dated 14th July, under sections 111(1)/111(3)/111(4)/111(7)/318(4)/319(2)/336(3)/338/340(1)/ 340(2)/61(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha, Sanhita, 2023 read with 66C/66D of IT Act, 2000 and 38 of the Aadhar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016 and Section 14C/14(c) of the Foreigners Act read with Section 14 of Foreigners Act;

And In the matter of : Bidhan Murmu ......Petitioner.

Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee Mr. Agniswar Chowdhury Mr. Pralay Hazra ......for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. APP Mr. Sujan Chatterjee ......for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner was arrested on 26th July, 2025. Petitioner is an Indian. He has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case, as such he may be released on bail. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been officially enrolled as an Aadhaar Operator.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner has misused his assignment and thereby transferred the finger print impression

which were in the form of a rubber stamp to the principal accused.

Having regard to the nature of accusation, at this stage a last opportunity is granted to the prosecution to proceed with the trial of the case. If there is no substantial progress in trial, petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court after 30th June, 2026.

At this stage, CRM (M) 2713 of 2025 is dismissed. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)