Tapas Ghosh @ Tapesh Ghosh v. State Of West Bengal

30.01.2026 Sl. No.32 NB CRM (A) 4363 of 2025 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Bhagawangola PS Case No.481/2025 dated 21.10.2025 under Section 329((4)/117(2)/118(2)/109/351(2)/3(5) of the BNS. And In the matter of: Tapas Ghosh @ Tapesh Ghosh ... petitioner Md. Bani Israil, Mr. Adwitiyo Raha.

...for the petitioner.

Ms. Pritha Paul.

..for the State.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The de facto complainant is the cousin of the petitioner. She had fled away with a boy. This led to an altercation between family members. There are case and counter case. Charge sheet has been submitted.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. She relies on the statements of victims as well as independent witnesses who have taken the name of the petitioner as an assailant. She relies on several injury reports, most of which show assault on vital part of the body like head with materials like brickbat.

Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)