← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/4369/2024allowed

Sk Ruhul Amin v. The State Of West Bengal

2024-12-16Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth2 pages

16.12.2024 sdas Allowed C.R.M. (A) No. 4369 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Pukhuria Police Station Case No. 572 of 2024 dated 03.10.2024 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/76/351(2)/ 109 of the BNS.

And In Re : Sk. Ruhul Amin ..... petitioner Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Sabrina Parveen .....for the petitioner Mr. Aritra Bhattacharya ....for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits there was a free fight between the parties. Petitioner also suffered injuries. He prays for anticipatory bail.

2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3.

We have considered the materials on record. There was a free fight between the parties. Petitioner also suffered injuries. Keeping in mind the aforesaid facts and as injuries are simple we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 18 th of December 2024 02:04:23 PM

satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and on condition that he shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 18 th of December 2024 02:04:23 PM