Rabin Debnath v. Kakali Debnath

& 15.

01.02.

2024.

Ct.655 s.g.

C.O. 3296 of 2014 Rabin Debnath Vs.

Kakali Debnath with C.O. 3718 of 2013 Rabin Debnath Vs.

Kakali Debnath Petitioner is not represented.

There is no representation on behalf of the opposite party.

There is reasonable ground to believe that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the present application. So, there is no option left but to dismiss the present case.

Accordingly, the revisional applications being C.O. 3296 of 2014 with C.O. 3718 of 2013 are hereby dismissed for default.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

There will be no order as to costs.

(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)