Golam Murtaza And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

03.01.2025 sdas dismissed C.R.M. (A) No. 4557 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Aberdeen Police Station Cyber Crime Ludhiana Punjab Case No.

dated 31.08.2024 under Sections 308(2)/319(2)/318(4)/351(2)/61(2) of the BNS read with 66C/66-D of the IT Act. And In Re : Golam Murtaza & Anr. ...... petitioners Mr. Snehasish Sutradhar Ms. Rumi Khatoon .....for the petitioners Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, learned APP Mrs. Shaila Afrin ..... for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits they have approached the jurisdictional court for necessary relief. It is also submitted they have co-operated with investigation. Report submitted by Aberdeen Police Station Cyber Crime Ludhiana Punjab is placed on record.

2.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3.

We have considered the materials on record. In view of the fact that petitioners have approached the jurisdictional court for necessary relief we do not express any opinion with regard to merits of the case.

4.

Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)