Pijush Kanti Dhar @ Pijush Dhar v. State Of West Bengal

19.12.2024 tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. (A) 4489 of 2024 sl no. 88 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 482 of BNSS 2023 in connection with Rampurhat P.S Case no. 335 of 2024 dated 9.9.2024 under sections 406/420 IPC Allowed and In Re : Pijush Kanti Dhar @ Pijush Dhar ...... petitioner Mr. Abdur Rakib Mr. J Mehedi ...... for the petitioner Ms. Baisali Basuj Ms. Jonaki Saha ...... for the State

1. Petitioner submits dispute is civil in nature and has been given a criminal profile. He prays for anticipatory bail.

2. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer.

3. We have considered the materials on record. In the FIR, it is alleged that a sale agreement was executed between the parties and part payment was made. Thereafter, the sale deed was not executed and registered. It is contended by the petitioner defacto complainant failed and/or neglected to pay the entire sale price. The dispute may be thrashed out before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. However, custodial interrogation of the petitioner for the purpose of investigation is not necessary and he may be granted anticipatory bail.

4. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, to the Signed By :

TAMAL KRISHNA MANDAL High Court of Calcutta 20 th of December 2024 04:09:28 PM

satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of BNSS 2023.

5. Petitioner shall appear before the jurisdictional court and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

6. The application being CRM (A) 4489 of 2024 is disposed of. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

TAMAL KRISHNA MANDAL High Court of Calcutta 20 th of December 2024 04:09:28 PM