← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/22/2026dismissed as not maintainable

Sudhanshu Shekar Ghosh v. State Of West Bengal

2026-01-30Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta2 pages

30.01.2026 Court No.28 Item No.48 tbsr CRM (A) 22 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mogra P.S. Case No.303 of 2025 dated 01.07.2025 under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under Section 3(2) of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013.

And In the matter of: Sudhanshu Shekar Ghosh ....Petitioner.

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kallol Kr. Basu Mr. Anindya Sundar Das Mr. Debapriya Samanta Md. Jannat Ul Firdous Mr. Rajsekhar Hota Mr. Suman Halder ....for the petitioner Mr. Madhusudan Sur, ld. APP Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ....for the State Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not specifically named in the FIR. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner is very much an accused in this case and there are incriminating materials available in the case diary against him. He submits that there is a bar for applying for anticipatory bail as per Section 21A of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2013.

In view of the above referred bar, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not maintainable.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)