Swapan Das Gupta v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

1857 23.04.2025 Ct.18 (Suvendu) W.P.A. 28917 of 2023 Swapan Das Gupta -vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Antara Chatterjee ....for the petitioner In terms of previous order affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner showing service of notice upon learned advocate representing State respondents is taken on record.

In spite of service of notice, State respondents are not represented.

Petitioner is a retired Clerk, who superannuated on 31st August, 2016. Due to superannuation of petitioner, first Pension Payment Order was issued on 5th July, 2016 and as per first Pension Payment Order disbursement of retiral dues was made in favour of the petitioner. Subsequently, due to revision of pay as per ROPA 2019 revised Pension Payment Order was issued on 12th May, 2021. Petitioner claims interest on revised gratuity as per revised Pension Payment Order due to delayed payment. Accordingly, the Director of Pension Provident Fund and Group Insurance and the concerned Treasury Officer are directed to pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum to petitioner on revised gratuity as per revised pension payment order from 14th February, 2020 till the date of actual disbursement of the revised gratuity amount in favour of the petitioner, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)