Pranab Kumar Mondal v. Madan Lal Shaw & ANR

rkd 03.04.2024 Ct. no.17 C.R.R. 4126 of 2015 In the matter of: Pranab Kumar Mondal ....petitioner.

None appears on behalf of the parties even on second call. They were also not appeared on the last occasion. This revision case is pending since 2015. Petitioner is not appearing despite administrative notice. It seems that his interest in this case is exhausted by now. Therefore, I have taken this matter today to decide on the basis of materials available on record.

This revisional application under section 401/482 Cr.P.C has been preferred by Pranab Kumar Mondal for setting aside of the Judgment dated October 5, 2015 passed by the Learned District Judge, Fast Track Court, 1st Court at Sealdah in Criminal Appeal No.1 of 2015, whereby he directed the petitioner/accused to pay fine by way of compensation amounting to Rs. 25,000/- to the complainant i.e. opposite party no.1 Madan Lal Shaw, in default suffer sentence of simple imprisonment for 1 month, by modifying the order of learned 2nd J.M. Sealdah passed in connection with Complaint Case No. C 541 of 2004 under Section 138 of N.I. Act on 21/04/2014 by which petitioner was convicted for the offence committed under Section 138 of N.I. Act and sentenced to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- and to pay compensation amounting to Rs.28,600/- to the complainant within one month of the date of judgment, in default Simple imprisonment of two months was granted.

Apparently, I do not find any irregularity in the impugned order impugned. The intervention of this Court is not required. Accordingly, the revision application stands dismissed on the basis of materials available on record.

The instant revision along with connected petition, if any, are disposed of. The interim order/orders, if any, shall stand vacated.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the learned Advocates for the parties on the usual undertakings.

(Uday Kumar, J.)