Dipti Som (Sinha) v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2.

2.

26.02.2025 26.02.2025 Ct. No. 18 (ARPAN) W.P.A. 30720 of 2024 Dipti Som (Sinha) Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Indranil Banerjee ...for the Petitioner No one appears on behalf of the State respondents.

Petitioner is a retired assistant teacher who superannuated on 31st August, 2013 and got the benefit under the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme (CPF). Subsequently, petitioner exercised option to come under the Pension-cum-Gratuity Scheme in terms of Government notification dated 13th June, 2014 which was issued in terms of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 16th July, 2013 passed on intra court appeal being APO No.94 of 2009 (State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Abhijit Baidya & Ors.).

It has also been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as per demand of the State respondents she has deposited the amount along with interest and additional interest which she received under CPF Scheme.

However, the grievance of the petitioner is after taking steps in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 by issuing pension payment order dated 5th

August, 2015 pensionary benefit was sanctioned in favour of the petitioner not from the date following the date of petitioner's retirement but from the date of refund which petitioner made after exercising option in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014. Petitioner claims issuance of revised pension payment order thereby sanctioning pensionary benefits from the date following the date of petitioner's superannuation based on the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019 passed on intra Court appeal being APO No.121 of 2007.

The Court has heard the learned advocate representing the petitioner and has perused the relevant materials available on record.

It is not the case that the petitioner did not exercise option within time in terms of the said notification dated 13th June, 2014 and the petitioner on duly exercising option in terms of notification dated 13th June, 2014 switched over from CPF to Pension-cumGratuity Scheme. On placing reliance on paragraph 55 of the judgment of the Special Bench dated 30th September, 2019, this Court does not find any impediment in extending the benefit of pension to the petitioner from the date following the date of petitioner's retirement provided exercise of option is made within time and

refund has been made as per the calculation of the State respondents.

Accordingly, this Court directs the State respondents to issue revised pension payment order in favour of the petitioner within twelve (12) weeks from the date of communication of this order thereby extending the benefit of pension from the date following the date of petitioner's superannuation.

With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

However, there shall be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)