Mohammad Rashidul Sk v. Union Of India And ORS.

04.11.2025 sdas WPA 126 of 2025 Mohammad Rashidul Sk.

Vs.

Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Abhishek Banerjee Mrs. Parna Banerjee Mr. Debabrata Mandal Ms. Sreetama Neogi Mr. Chinmoy Mukheree Mr. Aindrik Chatterjee .... for the petitioner Mr. Prabir Kumar Bhowmik Mr. Amit Sharma Mr. Abhishek Kumar Agrahari .... for the U.O.I.

Mr. Debabrata Das Mr. A. Sarkar Mr. Pratik Acharjee .... for the respondent no. 2 Mr. Probhat Kumar Srivastava Mr. Ritoban Sarkar Ms. Ankita Singh .... for the respondents no. 3 & 4 Ms. Rupal Singh Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh .... for the respondents no. 5 & 6

1. Let affidavit-of-service filed in Court be kept on record.

2. The petitioner has made a flurry of prayers which have presently scaled down to furnishing a copy of the deed of assignment by which the Bandhan Bank has assigned the petitioner's loan to the Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as "ARCIL").

3. The petitioner was unable to show that he had ever asked for the deed of assignment from the

Bandhan Bank, respondent no. 3 and 4. The petitioner also submits that he is ready and willing to settle the loan. Petitioner is at liberty to engage with the Bandhan Bank or ARCIL to seek settlement of his loan. The petition does not warrant any order or direction.

4. The writ petition is, thus, disposed of with the aforestated observations.

5. There shall, however, be no order as to costs.

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)