Chandi Charan Mondal v. Milton Dey & ANR

22.04.2025 Item No.52 PG/KS Ct. No.1 C.P.A.N. 2291 of 2012 In F.A. 238 of 2011 + I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2011 (Old No. CAN 7711 of 2011) + I.A. No. CAN 2 of 2012 (Old No. CAN 5478 of 2012) + I.A. No. CAN 5 of 2013 (Old No. CAN 3677 of 2013) + I.A. No. CAN 6 of 2015 (Old No. CAN 2879 of 2015) Sri Chandi Charan Mondal

Versus

Milton Dey & Anr.

Mr. Lutful Haque Mr. Moniruzzaman Mr. Jahangir Badsha .....For the Contempt Applicant

1. None appears for the respondents.

2. The contempt applicant is represented by the counsel.

3. It is submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the contempt applicant that the order and direction issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench has been complied with and the status quo, which was directed to be maintained, has been maintained. The applicant is satisfied that the order and direction has been complied with.

4. Recording the said submission, the contempt application stands disposed of.

5. No costs.

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities.

(T.S SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)