Md Mahasin v. Ayesha Bibi

16.07.2021 Item no.34 Ct. No.34 CHC C.R.R. No.4159 of 2012 (Via Video Conference) In Re: An application under Sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

AND In the matter of:- Md. Mahasin ... petitioner The subject-matter of grievance of the present revisional application relates to order dated 19.09.2012, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Court-I, Haldia, Purba Medinipur, wherein, the learned sessions court while exercising his revisional jurisdiction was pleased to affirm the order dated 30th April, 2021, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldia. I have perused the order so passed by the learned sessions court, wherein the learned sessions court approved the facts brought on record by the wife/opposite party herein. According to the learned sessions court such contention do not challenge the nature and character of the original application and as such no illegality was committed by the learned Magistrate by allowing such amendment to be made by the wife.

Having regard to the reasons so assigned by the learned sessions court while disposing of the revisional application, I am of the view that no interference is required to be called for. Accordingly, C.R.R.4159 of 2012 is dismissed. Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

All parties shall act in terms of copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)