Prahlad Bairagi v. Abdul Ajij Mondal

34.

15.01.

Ct. 655 s.g.

C.O. 3889 of 2014 Prahalad Bairagi Vs.

Abdul Ajij Mondal & Anr.

Petitioner is not represented.

There is no representation on behalf of the opposite parties despite service effected upon them. It appears that the instant application is preferred challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 25th August, 2014 and this instant application is pending since the year 2014.

It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to proceed with the present application. So, there is no justification to keep this revisional application alive in the list.

Accordingly, the revisional application being C.O. 3889 of 2014 is hereby dismissed for default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

There will be no order as to costs.

(Prasenjit Biswas, J.)