Amal Kanti Roy v. Smt Renuka Das And ORS

29.9.2022 SA 187 of 2002 Ct-08 Amal Kanti Roy Vs.

Smt. Renuka Das & Ors.

ar The appellant is not represented, nor any accommodation is prayed on his behalf.

In view of the affidavit of undertaking filed by the appellant on 11th March, 2002, it can be safely presumed that the possession has already been delivered. Nothing remains to be decided in the second appeal.

The second appeal is, therefore, summarily dismissed under Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

There will be no order as to costs.

(Uday Kumar ,J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)