← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/6660/2020rejected

Sunil Mandal v. State Of West Bengal

2020-10-06Hon'Ble Justice Soumen Sen,Hon'Ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya2 pages

C.R.M. 6660 of 2020 IA No. CRAN 1 of 2020 06-10-2020 sg (Via Video Conference) Court 11 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 697 of 2016 dated 10.10.2016 under Sections 147/148/149/447/307/302 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Arms Act.

Sunil Mandal

Versus

State of West Bengal Mr. Amitabha Karmakar, Adv.

Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick, Adv.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Neguive Ahmed, Adv.

Ms. Amita Gaur, Adv.

...for the State.

The petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per the Rules within one month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. The petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

CRAN 1 of 2020 is accordingly, disposed of.

We have been informed that the trial has commenced. The date of production of the accused persons is fixed by the learned trial court on 9th October, 2020 and depositions of the four witnesses have been completed till now.

Considering the statement of the victim under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure directly implicating the petitioner and having regard to the past conduct of the petitioner that he was absconding for two years, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. We, however, direct the learned trial court to expedite the trial and conclude the proceeding as expeditiously as possible without granting any

unnecessary adjournment to either of the party. The report filed by Mr. Ahmed, learned Advocate is kept with the record.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)