Uamar Faruk Alias Umar Faruque v. State Of West Bengal

21.09.2020 SL No.81 s.biswas (Rejected) C.R.M. 6713 of 2020 CRAN 1 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Harishchandrapur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2020 dated 05.02.2020 under Sections 341/324/326/307/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Uamar Faruk @ Umar Faruque ....Petitioner Mr. Kallol Mondal Mr. M. A. Sk.

Ms. Amrita Chel ...for the Petitioner Mr. Madhusudan Sur Mr. Dipankar Pramanick ...for the State.

Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference. Accordingly, the application being CRAN 1 of 2020 is disposed of.

Having considered the materials on record disclosing the prima facie involvement of the petitioner in assaulting the victim, one of whom succumbed to his injuries and in view of gravity of the offence, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. (Kausik Chanda, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)