Md Amran v. State Of West Bengal

23.092020 Item 10 Court No. 8 CP CRM 7045 of 2020 with CRAN 1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Karaya Police Station Case No. 188 of 2020 dated 30.05.2020 under Sections 364/307 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Md. Amran ....Petitioner.

Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee, Sk. Toslim Ali.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. APP, Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya.

...for the State.

The petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The application is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and has accordingly prayed for bail.

The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of bail.

We have perused the statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code as well as the injury report. Considering the nature and extent of the injury as well as the complicity of the petitioner in the commission of offence, we are not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Since the charge-sheet has already been filed,

we request the trial court to decide on the issue of framing of charges at the earliest and proceed with the trial and conclude it as expeditiously as possible.

The application for bail is rejected.

CRM 7045 of 2020 and CRAN 1 of 2020 are disposed of. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)