← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/7225/2020rejected

Samar Manna v. State Of West Bengal

2020-09-25Hon'Ble Justice Sanjib Banerjee,Hon'Ble Justice Aniruddha Roy2 pages

25.9.2020 Ct-16 ds & ar C.R.M. 7225 of 2020 with CRAN 1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Belgharia P.S Case No. 321 of 2020 dated 11.07.2020 under Section 376(3) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

And In the matter of: Samar Manna

...Petitioner.

Mr. Satadru Lahiri ... For the Petitioner Mrs. Sukanya Bhattacharya Md. Mirza Firoz Ahmed Begg ... For the State The petitioner undertakes to appropriately affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within one week of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. The petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

The petitioner claims that the mother of the defacto complainant was inducted as a licensee at the petitioner's premises and when the petitioner wanted the premises to be vacated, a completely false charge has been brought against the petitioner.

The State refers to the clear statement of the 13-yearold survivor. Considering the clear and categorical statement of the 13-year-old, the petitioner cannot be enlarged on bail at this stage.

CRM 7225 of 2020 along with the interim application therein are disposed of.

(Sanjib Banerjee, J.) (Aniruddha Roy, J.)