Raja Mollick@Raja Mallick v. State Of West Bengal

01.10.2020.

as (Rejected) C.R.M. 7245 of 2020 With CRAN 1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chatterjeehat P.S. Case No.60 of 2020 dated 18.05.2020 under Sections 447/326A/307/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Raja Mollick @ Raja Mallick. ... Petitioner.

Mr. Soham De Dhara.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Imran Ali, Ms. Manasi Roy.

.....for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference.

Accordingly, the application being CRAN 1 of 2020 is disposed of.

Having considered the materials on record disclosing prima facie involvement of the petitioner in subjecting the victim to acid burn injuries resulting in prolonged hospitalisation, we are of the opinion that in view of the gravity of the offence this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Shampa Sarkar, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)