Tapati Mukherjee v. State Of West Bengal

01.10.2020.

46.

as (Allowed).

C.R.M. 7302 of 2020 With C.R.A.N.1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chitpore P.S. Case No.113 of 2020 dated 22.06.2020 under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Court and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

In the matter of : Tapati Mukherjee & Ors.

... Petitioners.

Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya.

...for the Petitioners.

Mr. Bidyut Kr. Roy, Ms. Rita Datta.

.....for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court.

Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference.

Accordingly, the application, being CRAN 1 of 2020, is disposed of.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have been falsely implicated in the instant case. They have cooperated with investigation.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and keeping in mind the general and omnibus nature of allegations in the light of the submission that the petitioners have co-operated with investigation, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Shampa Sarkar,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)