Anjali Mondal v. Krishna Chakraborty

16.06.2022 Ct. No.23 pg.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CPAN 472 of 2020 in FMA 1853 of 2019 (MAT 228 of 2019) with IA No. CAN 1 of 2020 with IA No. CAN 2 of 2021 (Application not in the file) (Assigned) Anjali Mondal & Ors.

Vs.

Mrs. Krishna Chakraborty & Anr.

Mr. A.K. Rough Ms. Ananya Mondal ... For the applicants/appellants Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay Mr. Arka Kumar Nag Mr. Tirthankar Dey Mr. Souvik Roy ... For the alleged contemnors/respondents In re: CAN 2 of 2021 This is an application for substitution to record the death of the applicant/appellant no.1.

Mr. Bandopadhyay, learned advocate for the alleged contemnors/respondents, in his usual fairness, does not oppose this application.

Accordingly, the application for substitution, being CAN 2 of 2021, stands allowed.

The Department and/or Registry is directed to take appropriate steps to carry out the necessary amendment.

In re: CPAN 472 of 2020 In view of the admitted steps taken by the alleged contemnors/respondents pursuant to the filing of this contempt application, we are of the view that no useful purpose will be served in keeping this contempt application pending.

In view of the aforesaid, the contempt application is disposed of without any further orders.

The parties are directed to act in accordance with law.

In re: CAN 1 of 2020 Since the contempt application is taken up for hearing and disposed of, the instant application for early hearing is also disposed of.

(Arindam Mukherjee, J.) (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)