Raju Saha v. State Of West Bengal

09.10.2020 Ct. 23 SK/NB C.R.M. 7519 of 2020 CRAN 1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanchal Police Station Case No.

136/2020 dated 04.02.2020 under Sections 498A/323/313/354/376/511/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. And In the matter of : Raju Saha ..... Petitioner.

Ms. Minoti Gomes, Mr. Kausik Biswas .... for the Petitioner.

Mr. Tanmoy Kr. Ghosh, Ms. Soma Biswas ...for the State. The petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within one month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

Having regard to the statement made by the victim under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure directly implicating the petitioner, we are not inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. CRM 7519 of 2020 and CRAN 1 of 2020 are disposed of. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Soumen Sen, J.)

(Saugata Bhattacharyya , J.)