Rehana Bibi @ Rehana Bibi Sekh v. State Of West Bengal

06.10.2020 tkm C.R.M. 7557 of 2020 sl no. 36 CRAN 1 of 2020 (via video conference) In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta P.S case no. 392 of 2020 dated 17.9.2020 under sections 363/365/120B/376 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 4 of the POCSO Act And Allowed In Re : Rehana Bibi @ Rehana Bibi Sekh & Anr. ...... petitioners Mr. A K Biswas ...... for the petitioners Mr. T k Ghosh Mr. Arindam Sen ...... for the State Petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. Accordingly, the application being CRAN 1 of 2020 is disposed of.

Having considered materials on record and bearing in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners i.e. the parents of the principal accused and as the victim has been recovered, we are of the opinion custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary and they may be granted anticipatory bail. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application being CRM 7557 of 2020 is disposed of. (Aniruddha Roy, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)