Suprajit Sarkar @ Pradip Sarkar v. State Of West Bengal

08.10.2020.

24.

as (Allowed).

C.R.M. 7600 of 2020 With C.R.A.N.1 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta P.S. Case No.383 of 2020 dated 14.09.2020 under Sections 341/326/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Suprajit Sarkar @ Pradip Sarkar. ... Petitioner.

Mr. Amit Singh, Mr. Atis Kr. Biswas.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Bidyut Kr. Roy, Ms. Rita Datta.

.....for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court.

Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference.

Accordingly, the application, being CRAN 1 of 2020, is disposed of.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the instant case over a dispute between the parties.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the facts and circumstances of the case and as no C.T. Scan report showing internal brain injury is produced, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner, viz., Suprajit Sarkar @ Pradip Sarkar Islam shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Aniruddha Roy,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)