Hiru Mohamed@Mohammed v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. 7606 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) rkd 15.10.2020 Ct. No.03 (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baishnabnagar P.S. Case No. 266 of 2020 dated 01/06/2016 under Section 341/324/325/326/308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Hiru Mohamed @ Mohammed & Anr. ....petitioners.

Mr. M. Ghosh ...for the petitioner.

Mr. P. K. Datta, Mr. S. D. Roy ...for the State.

Petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference. Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the facts and circumstance of the case in the light of the submission that the instant case has arisen out of land dispute and as the injury does not appear to be grievous, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Subhasis Dasgupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)