← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/8114/2020disposed

Kalyani Das And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2020-10-20Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi (27.06.2011 - 29.08.2020),Hon'Ble Justice Md. Nizamuddin1 pages

C.R.M. 8114 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baishnabnagar P.S. Case No. 141 of 2020 dated 17/03/2020 under Sections 448/325/326/308/304/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And rkd 20.10.2020 Ct. No.03 (Allowed) In the matter of: Kalyani Das & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. A. Saha ...for the petitioners.

Mr. N. P. Agarwala, Ms. S. Patel ...for the State.

Petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within 48 hours of resumption of normal functioning of the Court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conference. Having considered the materials in the case diary and keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime and as they are the women folk of the family and their false implication owing to prior enmity cannot be wholly ruled out and as investigation is complete, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Md. Nizamuddin, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)