Nayan Sk @ Sekh v. State Of West Bengal

18.01.2021 Item No.35 Ct.No.28 Subha rejected C.R.M. 8194 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) Nayan Sk. @ Sekh -versusThe State of West Bengal In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in connection with Raninagar P.S. Case No.60 of 2020 dated 1401-2020 under Sections 325/326/307/302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Mr. Md. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Ali Hasan Alamgir Ms. Rabia Khatun ... For the Petitioner. Mr. Neguive Ahmed Mrs. Amita Gaur Ms. Manisha Sharma ... For the State. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than one year and although charge-sheet has been submitted, but there has been no progress in the case.

Mr. Ahmed, learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and draws the attention of this court to the statement of the injured as well as the post mortem report of the deceased.

According to the learned advocate for the State the accused was adamant and consistent in inflicting the fatal blows.

We have considered the materials available in the case diary which includes the post mortem report and the statement of the injured.

Having regard to the nature and gravity of the offence, we are not inclined to release the present petitioner on bail at this stage.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the present petitioners is rejected.

With the aforesaid observations, the application for bail being CRM 8194 of 2020 along with connected application, if any, is, accordingly, disposed of.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)