Kalyani Konai v. State Of West Bengal

21. 10 . 2020 CRM 8288 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Suri Police Station Case No. 238 dated 12.08.2020 under Sections 306/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

BP/SM Sl.39 In the matter of : Kalyani Konai & Ors......petitioners Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan Ms. Saryati Datta ..for the petitioners.

Mr. Partha Pratim Das, Mrs. Manasi Sharma ..for the State.

The petitioners undertake to appropriately stamp the petition as per the Rules within one month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the prime accused has already been arrested. The petitioners are innocent. They have been falsely implicated in the present case.

Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and produces the case

diary.

Considering the submissions as advanced by the learned advocates for the parties and after perusing the case diary, in our considered view, the petitioners should be granted bail.

Accordingly, we allow the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the event of arrest, the petitioner no. 1 (Kalyani Konai ), the petitioner no. 2 (Dayamay Konai) and the petitioner no.3 (Sandip Konai) shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case.

The aforesaid order shall be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 8288 of 2020 is disposed of.

(Samapti Chatterjee, J. ) (Aniruddha Roy, J.)