← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/8809/2020rejected

Sukanta Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal

2020-11-05Hon'Ble Justice Sanjib Banerjee,Hon'Ble Justice Arijit Banerjee2 pages

05.11.2020 Court No.16 Item No. 40 rpan CRM 8809 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Burdwan Police Station Case no.753 of 2018 dated 20.11.2018 under Section 21(C) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act;

And In Re: Sukanta Chakraborty ....Petitioner.

Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Mr. Santanu Maji ... for the petitioner.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh, Mr. Bitasok Banerjee ...for the State.

The petitioner says that he has been framed and there is no likelihood of the trial being completed in the immediate future. The State says commercial quantity of contraband was recovered from the person of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks to question the veracity of the seizure list and says that there were no independent witnesses.

Considering the fact that the trial has commenced but has been interrupted by the lockdown following the pandemic, the present prayer cannot be acceded to. It is hoped that the trial will resume and the same will be completed within eight months of the resumption of the normal court functioning.

CRM 8809 of 2020 is disposed of.

It will be open to the petitioner to apply to the appropriate authorities for any medical treatment that may be necessary. Upon such request being made, the authorities at the correctional home

should treat it charitably and take appropriate measures keeping in mind the rights of the petitioner even when in custody. (Sanjib Banerjee, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)