Juyel Haque @ Juyel Hok v. State Of West Bengal

17.12.2020 Court No.28 SL No.79 AP CRM 8848 of 2020 (Through Video Conference) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No.96 of 2020 dated 22.07.2020 under Sections 365/376/325/506 /34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Juyel Hoque @ Juyel Hok ....Petitioner.

Mr. Arijit Ghosh ...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Mr. Aniruddha Biswas ...for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there was a love affair between the parties and they cohabited together. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record including the statement of the victim under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the light of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Under such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. The parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this court. (Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)