Gopal Chandra Routh Alias Badal Routh v. State Of West Bengal

27.11.2020 Sl. No.65 akd [Rejected] C. R. M. 9210 of 2020 [via video conferencing] In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tamluk Police Station Case No.555 of 2013 dated 18.12.2013 under Sections 420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re: Gopal Chandra Routh @ Badal Routh ... ... Petitioner Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu .. Advocate Mr. Arindam Ghosh .. Advocate Md. Jannat-ul-Firdous .. Advocate ... ... for the petitioner Mr. Sudip Ghosh .. Advocate Mr. Bitasok Banerjee .. Advocate ... ... for the State Having considered the materials on record disclosing prima facie involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime involving misappropriation of funds of innumerable depositors which is more than one crore of rupees, we are of the opinion that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to him.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)