Dhirendra Nath Roy And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

17.12.2020 Sl. No.130 akd [Dismissed not pressed] C. R. M. 9245 of 2020 [via video conferencing] (CRAN 1 of 2020) In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 28.10.2020 in connection with Jalpaiguri Women Police Station Case No. 107 of 2020 dated 12.10.2020 under Sections 365/376(2)(n)(3) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 6/17 of POCSO Act.

And In Re: Dhirendra Nath Roy & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Jaydeep Kanta Bhowmick .. Advocate ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Aditi Sankar Chakraborty .. Ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Biswarup Roy .. Advocate ... ... for the State Petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition/application as per Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. Subject to such undertaking, the application is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. The application being CRAN 1 of 2020 is accordingly, disposed of.

Learned advocate-on-record for the petitioners submits that his clients do not want to proceed with the instant application for anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as not pressed. (Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)