Biswajit Kumar Das v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.
06.08.2021 Court No. 19 Item no.05 CP WPA 9449 of 2020 Biswajit Kumar Das VS The State of West Bengal & ors.
(via video conference) Md. Younush Mondal ......for the petitioner.
Mr. Sabyasachi Mukherjee ....for the respondents 6 to 8.
Mr. Subhabrata Datta Mr. Benazir Ahmed .....for the State.
Despite service none appears on behalf of the pradhan, Deganga - 1 Gram Panchayat.
It is the contention of the petitioner that the respondent nos.
to have been raising unauthorised construction by illegally engroaching into a portion of the land of the petitioner. The land in question is situated at Plot No. 583, J. L. No. 30, Mouza-Deganga, P.S.
Deganga, Dist-North Parganas. It is the contention of the petitioner that the petitioner became owner of the said land by purchase upon execution of a registered deed of conveyance dated July 2, 2020. It appears that alleging such encroachment and illegal construction Title Suit No. 299 of 2020 has been filed. The said
Title Suit is pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court at Barasat. It is alleged that although the petitioner has made several complaints before the pradhan of Deganga - 1 Gram Panchayat, no steps have been taken by the said authority.
Learned advocate for the respondents 6 to 8 submits that a civil suit is pending on the self-same cause of action. He further submits that the question of encroachment into the lands of the petitioner did not arise and the said respondents have not raised any illegal construction.
The learned advocate for the State respondents appears before the court and submits on instruction from the concerned Block Development Officer that the alleged land over which the construction has been made is a private land recorded in the name of one Kazi Azhar Jaman and others.
From the report filed by the Block Development Officer, it appears that the panchayat authorities had informed that no permission for construction of any building on the said plot had been granted to any person.
Having considered the rival contentions of the parties, this court is of the opinion that the question of title of the petitioner and the encroachment over the property are not to be decided by the panchayat
authorities. The same shall be decided in the civil suit, if the civil suit is still pending.
However, with regard to the allegations of unauthorized construction in the absence of sanctioned building plan or in the absence of permission from the appropriate authority, it is the panchayat authorities who should ensure that illegal construction does not take place.
Under such circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction upon the competent authority of Deganga - 1 Gram Panchayat to act and proceed in accordance with law with regard to the alleged illegal construction. An inspection of the premises shall be held in the presence of the petitioner as also the representative of respondent nos. 6 to 8. If it is found that there are illegal constructions, then the panchayat authorities shall act and proceed in accordance with law. A hearing shall be given to the parties concerned and a reasoned order shall be passed. The authorities shall reach the proceedings to its logical conclusion as per the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973.
The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of five months from the date of communication of this order.
With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties are to act on the server copy of this order.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)