Wasim Jaman v. State Of West Bengal

02.12.2020.

74.

as (Allowed).

C.R.M. 9620 of 2020 (Via Video Conference) In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaliachak P.S. Case No.568 of 2020 dated 25.07.2020 under Sections 417/376/313/120B of the Indian Penal Code. In the matter of : Wasim Jaman.

... Petitioner.

Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Imran Ali, Mr. M. F. A. Begg.

.....for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there was a love affair between the parties and he has been falsely implicated in the instant case.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner tortured the victim and cohabited with her through deceit. We have considered the materials on record in the light of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner. We are of the opinion custodial interrogation of the petitioner for progress of investigation is not necessary but the petitioner requires to co-operate with the investigation in accordance with law

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner, viz., Wasim Jaman shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until further order.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Suvra Ghosh,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)