Pankaj Kumar Singh v. Union Of India And Another

7th December, (AK) W.P.A. 9825 of 2020 Pankaj Kumar Singh Vs.

Union of India and others Mr. Md. Dilwar Khan ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Avinash Kankani ...for the Union of India.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a receipt of service of notice which is kept on record.

2.

It is submitted that the writ petition was preferred against an order of disqualifying the petitioner as Director of companies till October 31, 2023.

3.

In view of expiry of such period, the concerned Director's Identification Number (DIN) is due to be reactivated subject to other conditions being fulfilled by the petitioner.

4.

Hence, it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the writ petition has become infructuous.

5.

In view of the above submission, WPA 9825 of 2020 is disposed of as infructuous without any order as to costs.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)